▶
▶
WAS EINSTEIN WRONG?
Welcome to Beyond Einstein! This site is exactly what it sounds like: it's time to acknowledge that even the great Albert Einstein made a critical error, one that continues to impact modern science. Our research has been constrained by a near-religious devotion to what we call the "Church of Einstein." In the process, we've allowed mathematicians to dominate physics, propping up a flawed model with countless theories that often defy basic logic. It’s time to reexamine our first principles, leverage the scientific observations of the past century, and correct the core mistake.
Yes, I know—Einstein was Time magazine’s Person of the Century, and I agree with the choice, though for reasons very different from theirs. Einstein and his Theories of Relativity sparked the last major paradigm shift in physics. For 100 years, his work has been revered, and scientific progress has largely remained bound by his ideas. Even today, his theories still represent the gold standard in physics.
However, in 1905, Einstein made a fundamental mistake when he discarded the concept of the ether in his Theory of Special Relativity—an error he acknowledged in 1920. Over the past century, this mistake has compounded, leaving us with the fragmented and confusing state of modern physics.
We will identify the core error, provide a correction and view all scientific observations through a corrected lens. We will then compare the conclusions with what we see through the current consensus lens. You can decide which theory makes the most sense.
If Einstein had known what we know today he would not have theorized General Relativity. Things like Dark Matter and its ugly cousin Dark Energy would have disgusted him! Love this or hate it, it is time to seriously consider the possibility of a first principles error. We need to move beyond Einstein. It is almost impossible to be this far off course without a foundational error. Young physicists need to be able to question the first principles without threat of excommunication, something they cannot do today. It is time to disrupt the status quo.
Disclaimer: It has been very difficult trying to simplify todays Consensus Model of Physics in order to compare the two theories. The current model conflicts with itself, several key theories have different descriptions depending on how they are viewed from the different scientific silos. It is a mess! Einstein's Gravitational Theory has different explanations and nobody understands Quantum Theory. I encourage anyone with questions to do your own research and wish you luck in trying to follow the logic trail. After all, the foundations for most of today's key theories were plugged in while the majority of our population traveled by horse and buggy, crossed the country by train and sailed to Europe.
Cree Edwards
EINSTEIN'S ERROR
Could Einstein have made a mistake in his thought experiment back in 1905? A thought experiment is like a computer program. You put in a bunch of assumptions and let it run. We know for a fact that several of the theories Einstein used in his thought experiments were incorrect (Bohr's model of the atom) so like a computer program, “garbage in, garbage out”. We should not be surprised if Einstein had made an error, we should be shocked if he hadn't!
Einstein was actually the first person to call out his error (omission) in the Theory of General Relativity. On May 5th in 1920 he gave a speech at Leiden University where he concluded, “Recapitulating, we may say that according to the general theory of relativity space is endowed with physical qualities; in this sense, therefore, there exists an ether.” Unfortunately the newly anointed physics power base had no interest in going back and rehashing the ether debate so they just plowed ahead.
Seven years later at the Solvay conference in Brussels, the proverbial shit hit the fan. Relativity failed at the sub atomic level and was replaced in a highly contested vote by a mathematical predictive tool, Quantum, as the theory to try and theorize the very small. Einstein strenuously objected, “If Quantum theory is correct, it signifies the end of physics as a science.” Again, Einstein was correct and ignored!
This was the point of no return. This is where an objective physics establishment would have stopped and re evaluated the first principles. Instead, the physics industry ignored Einstein and launched all aspects of physics, from education to research, off into the weeds. Over the last 100 years they have piled up scores of garbage theories to prop up a failed model leaving us where we are today; with a conflicting, confused, completely illogical set of theories guiding our researchers down dead end after dead end. The error had to be made prior to 1927 so it must be deeply embedded in our first principles, way beyond anything that is being debated today.
We will listen to Einstein and identify the first principles error, correct the error and propose a Unified Theory of Physics and possibly a platform for a Unified Theory of Everything.
disqualifying relativity and quantum
Einstein made a critical error, an omission that has sent us off on a 100 year long wild goose chase.
There are two massive, obvious failures in today's consensus model of physics that alone should disqualify our current theories. We have known both of these failures for 100 years and have done nothing about them. It is time to move on.
First, Special Relativity quickly failed to work when looking at the sub atomic world so the scientific peer review group of the day elevated a probabilistic mathematical tool to "core theory status". Quantum Theory was born. Why is this a problem? The theories we use to describe the behavior of the atom should scale to describe the behavior of large objects. Big things like planets, stars and galaxies are nothing more than large accumulations of small things, atoms. Quantum and Relativity are irreconcilable, and have diverged massively. A large object should reflect the cumulative behavior of all of its parts.
Second, is the dependence on Fundamental Forces. The Theory of Relativity and Quantum Theory are completely dependent on things called Fundamental Forces, science's biggest theoretical cop-out. Whenever scientists observe something that cannot be explained within the confines of the accepted theories, they “discover” a new Fundamental Force. By definition the cause of so called Fundamental Forces does not need to be explained, they just are and we are expected to accept them on face value. No more questions, just move on. This is unacceptable.
It is pathetic that our massive Physics Industry allows this failed and bifurcated theory to continue. Einstein made a critical error in 1905 and we are paying the price 100 years later. Let's fix his error and start making progress again!
three reasons why the physics industry cannot self-correct
"WE CAN'T SOLVE PROBLEMS BY USING THE SAME KIND OF THINKING WE
USED WHEN WE CREATED THEM."
- Education/Indoctrination: Education can be a two edged sword, there is a fine line between rigorous education and indoctrination. If a young person wants to be a physicist they must succeed at all levels in their 20 year education process. They succeed by learning and repeating what their professors teach them, down to every small detail. If you find something illogical and question its validity you will hit an institutional wall and most likely find another career. We are forcing conformity and selecting against creativity.
- Physics by committee. The peer review process in today's science community will only serve to protect the status quo. Every member of the peer review process has already been indoctrinated. They all believe the same theories to be true creating group-think in an echo chamber. With everyone agreeing and congratulating each other on their brilliance there is no place for creativity. Committees cannot solve complex problems. For example, we are spending billions of dollars on Dark Matter research even though most people think that it is a dumb theory. This is defensive physics, trying to defend against the disruption of the status quo.
- Publish or perish. In order to advance you must publish something, anything, often. They struggle to come up with things that are a little different but will be acceptable to their peers. If you want a research grant your project must be acceptable to your peers or it will not be funded. You cannot rock the boat. We have libraries full of BS theories based on prior theory going farther and farther away from the truth. This cycle must stop.
what is needed to drive a paradigm shift
There are two ways to trigger a paradigm shift; a new discovery (which will not happen within the constraints of our current set of theories) or an alternate theory consistent with all scientific observations instead of the current paradigm.
In 1650, Galileo's observations of planetary movements was the discovery driving that paradigm shift, the earth is no longer the center of the universe.
In 1917, Einstein's proposed theory of General Relativity offered a better theoretical solution than what was provided by Newtonian physics. We are now in the Einsteinian paradigm.
We are going to propose a simple correction to the first principles of the General Theory of Relativity, a correction that Einstein called for in 1920. We will add back physical properties of vacuum space and properly define the properties of the Ether. With that, we can discard 100 years of band-aid theories added to prop up our failed Standard Model. The corrected theory will scale mathematically and logically from the behavior of the atom to the movement of galaxies without the need to use any fundamental force cop out.
Our hope is to identify the problem, provide a solution and have a serious discussion, something the physics establishment desperately needs yet will fight aggressively. If they need to defend what they have today it will quickly fall like the house of cards that it is. We need to tell the emperor that he has no clothes on!
CORRECTED THEORY
The Problem
There are two disqualifying problems with today's consensus model. The inability to unify the theories of the very large with the theories describing the very small and that both theories are critically dependent on science's greatest cop out, Fundamental Force Theories. So let's construct a theory that scales from the atom to the behavior of galaxies without the need to plug in fundamental forces.
The atom is the only building block for all matter in the universe. Every atom is active, the nuclei is oscillating, each nuclei is surrounded by a powerful active field and every atom generates an electromagnetic field that extends well beyond the body of the atom.
The Question
So the question arises, “where does the energy come from that powers every atom?”
We know that all movement in the universe requires an energy transaction; there is no perpetual motion and this includes the atom. Today's consensus model avoids this key question by deploying the Fundamental Force cop out. If they can't explain an observation they will call it a fundamental force and the problem just goes away. We have blindly accepted this pathetic explanation and we stopped asking questions. No more!
The Solution
Let's do a quick thought experiment: Where could the energy come from to power the atom's activity? Think about it…and you will find that there is only ONE possible solution. The energy must come from what we currently theorize as vacuum space. There are NO other theoretical options. None.
Ok, so what does this mean? First, vacuum space does have physical properties (just as Einstein told us in 1920). Therefore there must be an ether and the ether must have energy properties and the ether must interact with matter.
So we will extend the matter/energy relationship, E=MC^2, to include an energy space relationship. We will expand the definition of energy to include a massless state, Ether Energy (or Clear Energy).
The universe floats in an endless ocean of Ether Energy. Every atom in the universe draws in this energy to operate much like a jet engine draws in oxygen. All motion in the universe can be accounted for by the flows of energy from this matter/energy relationship. This is the definition of a Unified Theory, scaling from the atom to the movement of galaxies.
As the clear energy converges on an object the concentration of potential energy will increase as the volume it occupies decreases (the reverse of the inverse squared law). As the massless energy ultimately converges on the nuclei of the atom it will reach a saturation point and begin transitioning into a physical state, the electron field (plasma field) forms.
It is from this self generated field that the atom harvests energy (electrons) in order to operate. This transitioning energy is the atom's power source!
The atom's nucleons are bonded together by a current that runs through the nucleus locked together much like an electric lock, all powered by the harvested energy.
The electromagnetic field is generated by the inner nuclei current.
Each element will have a different rate of energy harvesting and a different frequency of inner nuclei current. It is these two variables that dictate the different behaviors of each element.
Large objects like the earth (stars and galaxies) are made of nothing more than large accumulation's of atoms. So if every atom in the body of the earth is attracting clear energy then the earth should reflect the cumulative energy draw of all of its parts, and it does! As the energy converges on the earth the concentration of the massless energy flow continues to increase. At 100,000km (roughly) from the earth the concentration of clear energy reaches a point great enough and will begin to interact with other objects as it passes through them. It is this flow of energy, the drag of this current, that results in what we see as gravity.
We have made one theoretical alteration and have eliminated the need to use the fundamental force cop out and at the same time we have theorized a Unified Theory. All we have done is extend the definition of energy to include a clear state, added back in an ether, and defined its relationship with matter. With the corrected theory we can now eliminate scores of band aide theories added over the last 100 years. Remove both quantum theory and the theories of relativity and replace these two failed theories with a single Unified Theory.
Also, with the addition of a clear state of energy we can begin to reintegrate the sciences of consciousness with the physical model of the universe. Consciousness is massless energy! And just maybe we can provide a on-ramp for metaphysics, two things we actually care about!
It is time to make this first principles correction and allow our next generation of physicists the opportunity to explore new frontiers. It is time to start making progress in energy and health sciences unburdened by past mistakes. The greatest scientific breakthroughs happen after a paradigm shift.
VIDEO LINK:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNb7W2nTP24
importance of a correct theory
Our theories are the roadmap our scientific researchers use to explore new frontiers beyond what we can currently see. If our theories are incorrect our researchers will search and find nothing, they will waste the effort. If the theories are correct or close to correct our researchers may discover something of great importance.
Over the last several thousand years we have tested and documented how our world works, our terrestrial physics is well understood. As we look beyond the earth we are incredibly limited in what we can observe, with the exception of minimal access to the moon and now Mars we are left being passive observers of our solar system and the universe. We observe, collect a little observational data and apply a lot of theory to paint the picture of how big things work. If our guiding theories are incorrect our understanding of how everything works will be completely wrong.
We have the same problem with the very small, we simply cannot see anything. We make limited observations, apply a massive amount of theory and try to paint a picture of how the subatomic world works. Blunt trauma research is our best effort to try and understand the atom. We smash neutrons together in our super colliders and do our best to see what nucleons are made of. The problem here is that we cannot see the collision and the resulting debris disappears in .00000000000001 seconds, so we really do not have the opportunity to study anything but the energy released from the collision and even that is spotty.
We believe that the theories we are currently using to guide our researchers are critically flawed, simply do not work and as expected we are discovering nothing new with all of our efforts. In order to advance we MUST correct our foundational theories (something much easier said than done) and provide our researchers a new road map.
We are introducing a corrected theoretical lens to view our limited macro and micro scientific observations through. We will compare what we see through the corrected lens with what we see through the lens of our current consensus model. You can decide which set of theories gives us the best path forward.
foundation of a unified theory
In 1927 the theory of relativity failed to describe the behavior of the very small and a group of leading physicists voted and elevated Quantum, a probabilistic mathematical tool to Theory status, much to Einstein’s dismay. Our theories attempting to describe our universe bifurcated, General Relativity remained as theory to model the very large and Quantum Theory became the foundation for sub atomic theories. Einstein was the first to begin the search for finding a unified theory because large things were simply large accumulations of small things, so the behavior of large things should reflect the cumulative behavior of their parts.
The physics community had assumed that they would “discover” something that would bring the two theories back together. The Higgs Boson was the last great hope, the “God Particle”. Ten years ago they saw an anomaly at CERN, claimed they found the Higgs, then crickets…apparently the God Particle was not the unifying discovery! The search has been going on for 100 years with no progress, if anything the two theories have diverged. These theories are now mathematically and logically irreconcilable.
This is one of two foundational issues that should disqualify our consensus model. This alone should compel the physics community to begin questioning first principles, unfortunately the current inertia and the “decision makers” desire to protect Einstein and the status quo seems to be overriding the obvious need for some self reflection. This industry needs disruption!
energy systems
What is an Energy System? All movement in the universe can be tracked back to the energy needs of the atom. The atom is the smallest energy system in the universe, the one and only building block. Each energy system has a Big Dog, that is the object that dominates the flow of clear energy in that region of space.
The Atom
The nuclei of the atom is the Big Dog in each atoms energy system, all activity in each atom is caused by the energy needs of the Big Dog. Each nuclei draws in clear energy, as the energy converges on the nuclei the potential energy reaches a saturation point above the nucleus and physical energy transitions into this newly established field. The Clear Energy reaches a saturation point and transitions from a massless state into physical energy, a plasma field (electron field) forms and electrons flash into and out of the field. The nuclei harvests this energy as needed.
The Earth
The earth is the Big Dog in this region of the solar system, its behavior is the result of the cumulative behavior of all of its embedded energy systems, the cumulative needs of all of its atoms. Each atom draws in Clear Energy the earth draws in massive amounts of Clear energy from this region of the solar system. The radius of the earths energy system is roughly 600,000Km. The flow of Clear energy in this energy system all goes toward the earth. As the energy concentrates (the inverse squared law in reverse) it reaches a point where the flow will interact with other objects. Gravity is the result of the energy flow providing a drag on all of the objects it passes through including each of us.
Our moon has a much smaller energy system and is an embedded energy system in the earths energy system, Clear energy flowing toward the earth passes through and around the moons energy system providing a drag that keeps the moon in orbit.
The Sun
The Sun is the Big Dog in our solar energy system. The earth is an embedded energy system in our Sun's enormous energy system (roughly 5 trillion kilometers in radius). The Sun draws in Clear Energy from this region of the Milky Way galaxy. As the flow passes through and around each embedded energy system it provides a drag that holds the planet in an orbit (balancing with the planets lateral momentum). It is the energy emerging from the concentrating clear energy as the flow reaches a saturation point above the sun's surface that results in the sun's luminosity.
The Galaxy
The Milky Way's energy system is roughly 40,000 light years in radius(a light year is roughly 9 trillion kilometers…unimaginably large). Our solar system in an embedded energy system in the Galactic Energy System orbiting the galaxy 27,000 light years out once every 212 million years. The Black Hole is the Big Dog in the Galactic Energy System. As clear energy is attracted to the galactic disk it will transition into other energy states. As energy transitions from a Clear state to a physical state an energy imbalance occurs in this region of the Universe.
Nature always restores balance. The Black Hole serves as natures energy balancing mechanism, much in the same way nature restores atmospheric presure imbalances with a hurricane. The black hole serves the same function as the eye of a hurricane, drawing in everything surrounding it to correct an atmospheric pressure imbalance. It is not a coincidence that that a hurricane and a galactic disk appear to be very similar, nature repeats herself.
All energy states are drawn into the black hole, Clear Energy, plasma, radiated energy and matter and all are destabilized back into a Clear State and blasted back into its region of the universe to restore the energy balance. Every once in awhile an entire solar systems will enter the black hole, all matter is destabilized back into a plasma state and blasted out into space and we see this as a quasar. The Plasma jet will spread out back into a clear state over time and circle back into the body of the Galaxy to service the energy needs of each atom.
APPLIED THEORY
The vast majority of our mainstream physics community acknowledges that we are approaching a likely paradigm moment; the consensus model is not serving us well and nearly all of our big dollar research projects are coming up well short. For the last 100 years our physicists have been looking for the “discovery” to unite Quantum and Relativity failing miserably in their quest. It is time to question the first principles, identify the core error, correct the error and debate theoretical options.
There are two catalysts that can derive a paradigm shift is physics. First is a discovery/observation that conflicts with the consensus model of the day. This happened in 1650 resulting in massive theoretical revolution when the Earth Centric model was replaced and Newtonian physics was launched. More impactful, Metaphysics and Theoretical Physics diverged and the Bible was no longer the gold standard in physics.
The second paradigm catalyst is a failing consensus model being replaced by a better model that is consistent with all scientific observations. This happened in the early 1900's resulting in Einsteinian physics replacing Newtonian physics. Einsteinian Physics bifurcated in 1927 and left us with diverging theories to explain the very small and very large resulting in the mess we have today.
We are proposing a first principles correction and a unified theory consistent with ALL scientific observations before the observations were corrupted by the flawed consensus model. In this section we will compare and contrast important scientific theories through the two theoretical lenses and hopefully start a debate that may lead to a theoretical course correction and an opportunity for our next generation of physicists to explore in more promising areas. Please continue with an open mind; it is entirely possible that both Quantum and Relativity are incorrect and are the actual problem that has sent us so far off course.
macro observations
"THERE IS SOMETHING FASCINATING ABOUT SCIENCE. ONE GETS SUCH WHOLESALE RETURNS OF CONJECTURE OUT OF SUCH A TRIFLING INVESTMENT OF FACT"
We are passive observers of the universe sitting on a tiny piece of space dust 27,000 light years from the center of our mid sized galaxy which is only 1 of billions of similar galaxies. We sit here and observe what little radiated energy we can and pile libraries full of theoretical BS to construct an absurd story about the behavior of our universe. Then physicists feed us things like the Big Bang, Dark Matter and Dark Energy, bending of Space Time and hundreds of other detailed stories to make us think they actually know something. They do not! They tell us that the Strong Force came out of the Big Bang ten to the minus 43rd second after the Bang. There is absolutely ZERO solid scientific observation to support that conclusion. If you take the time to dig down and actually look at the “observation” you will see that .1% is actual observation and 99.9% is applied theory with a good children's story to deliver the message. A pile of crap used as the foundation that the rest of the theories are built on.
The Sun
We have two main scientific observations that drive most of the theoretical modeling of our sun:
- It radiates 3.8x10^26th watts of energy every second.
- The sun's spectral signature show mostly hydrogen and helium.
Consensus Model:
The sun is a giant ball of hydrogen and helium that formed out of the remnants of a star(s) that super nova'd billions of years ago. The earth and all of the planets formed from the same dust cloud that the sun came from. The sun's radiated energy comes from a nuclear fusion reaction 700,000km below the surface of the sun. The energy works its way through the body of the sun and erupts out of the chromosphere. (The complexity of today's model makes it impossible for me to summarize, please go do you own online research.)
Comments: everything above is pure theory based on 1% scientific observation. Even with this there are several conflicts with other theories.
- Why is there so much hydrogen in the sun and only trace amounts on all of the other planets? Gravitational theory would suggest that all of the heavier elements should have been attracted first?
- How does the energy from the core of the Sun make its way through 700,000km of densely packed matter?
- Spectroscopy is our main scientific tool. Each element has a unique spectral signature, the sun shows hydrogen and helium. The limitation of spectroscopy is that all it can tell you is what is on the surface. The sun is fluid, the lighter elements will migrate to the surface, hydrogen and helium. Everything below the corona is 100% theory.
Corrected Model:
The sun is very large, it has a massive demand for Clear Energy. The difference between the sun and the earth is size. The concentration Clear Energy approaching the sun reaches a saturation point 20,000km above the surface of the sun and starts transitioning into a physical state above the body, the chromosphere forms. A massive electrical storm ensues, 90% of the transitioned energy is radiated outward. 10% of the energy makes it through the chromosphere to the body of the sun.
The energy emerging from a clear state creating the chromosphere is exactly the same process as we see around the nuclei of the atom, a highly charged electrical storm. The difference is that the converting energy in the chromosphere is not all inwardly focused, it is a dynamic conversion zone and opposed to the atoms static conversion zone.
The sun is NOT a giant ball of hydrogen. The radiated energy is not from a nuclear fusion reaction at the center of the sun. When it ultimately super nova's many of the complex materials that came from a previous star, the body of our sun, will cool and form more planets like our earth.
Gravity
Observation: Objects move toward other large objects.
Standard Model lens: there are two explanations:
- Gravity is a fundamental force, objects are attracted to each other at a distance. What powers this attraction? It is an intrinsic property of matter, it doesn't need power, it just happens. Although we know from our local physics that things don't move without cause, the laws of nature are suspended for Fundamental Forces.
“In physics, the fundamental interactions or Fundamental Forces are the interactions that do not appear to be reducible to more basic interactions."
- Large objects cause a depression in space time and the bending of space time causes other objects to swirl around the object.
Clear Energy lens: The universe floats in an ocean of Clear Energy, in the ether. Every atom needs an energy source to operate, every atom draws in Clear Energy. The earth reflects the cumulative energy needs of all of its atoms, the earth draws in large amounts of Clear Energy from this region of the solar system. As the waves of energy approach the earth the concentration of the energy in the wave increases. The flow reaches a concentration great enough to create a drag on all of the objects it passes through, including each of us. Gravity is the drag we feel in the flow of energy moving toward large objects.
Dark Matter
Observation: telescope technology reached a point in 1960's allowing astrophysicists to observe the Andromeda Galaxy. They observed stars on the outer ring of the galactic disk moving at speeds that conflicted with predictions made by Einstein's Gravitational Theory. There was not enough matter in the galaxy to explain the speed.
Consensus Model: Einstein's Gravitational Theory is correct ,therefore there must be more matter than we can see. They then sent the observation to the mathematicians to calculate how much more matter you would need for Einstein's theory to work. They concluded that you needed more than four times the matter, so there MUST be more matter than we can see and voila, they “discovered” dark matter. We have spent the last 20 years and billions of dollars looking for any indication of Dark Matter. So far nothing. Worse yet, we are teaching the next generation of physicists about Dark Matter.
Corrected Model. Einstein's Gravitational Theory is incorrect. Dark matter is just the latest band aid theory to prop up a failed model and protect the status quo.
Changing the construct of the universe to protect the status quo seems to me to be fraudulent!
Dark Energy
Mathematical Observation:
With the addition of Dark Energy to the consensus model mathematicians discovered an unintended consequence. The prevailing theory in the consensus model was that the Universe was expanding. Using Einstein's gravitation math they calculated that with all the additional “matter” the universe would be collapsing. There was no actual observation, but they had an equation balancing issue if the expanding universe theory was correct.
Consensus Model:
Mathematicians to save the status quo again! The only option theorist had to protect the Expanding Universe Theory was to follow the Dark Matter playbook and “discover/invent” Dark Energy, the ugly cousin of Dark Matter. So now they tell us that Dark Energy permeates the universe and pushes everything apart. It, like Dark Matter is everywhere but we cannot even begin to detect either! Wow!
Corrected Model:
There is no Dark Energy and there is no Dark Matter, and we will discuss the Expanding Universe theory in another section. This is all BS to protect the status quo, and again, this seems fraudulent. Now we are teaching the next generation about Dark Energy as part of their Indoctrination.
micro observations
Behold, the Standard Model of Physics, the biggest pile of theoretical crap ever subscribed to! This particle onion is impossible to peel, everything physicists have added to it over the last 50 years is a result of print or perish requirements of our researchers and their incestuous relationship with mathematicians. They are forced to discover things or their funding and status is at risk. We cannot even see a proton let alone components of it: up, down, top, bottom, charm, strange. And don't forget all their other Anti-BS just to double the discoveries. And that is just the quark family! And, by the way, we have never even seen a quark!
The Atom
What powers the atom?
Observation: every atom has a powerful field surrounding the nucleus. Every atom has positively charged nucleons that need to be held together. Every atom generates a powerful electromagnetic field exptending beyond the body of the atom. Question: where does the energy come from allowing all of this activity to take place 24/365/billions of years? That is a lot of energy.
SMT: All of the activity inside of the atom is powered by Fundamental Forces, forces that emerged from the Big Bang 13.8 billion years ago. Fundamental Forces do not need a power source, they just are because that is what they are. Therefore the atom does not need a power source.
CET: Every atom in the Universe is drawing in Clear Energy much like a candle draws in oxygen. As the clear energy converges the potential energy in the wave stays the same but the volume it occupies is drastically reduced increasing the energy concentration/ unit volume. At roughly 300 pico-meters above the nuclei the concentration of potential energy reaches a saturation point and the electron field forms (plasma field). Energy is transitioning from a Clear state into a physical state, electrons flash into and out of this field. The nuclei will harvest electrons from the field as needed when the charge in the nuclei wanes. It is the energy harvested from this field that powers the atom.
Electron Field
Observation: every atom has an “electron field”. This field makes up 99.999% of the volume of an atom. This field contains tiny negatively charged objects, electrons. The larger the nuclei, the greater the electron activity in the electron field.
Standard model: the SMT says that electrons orbit the nuclei of every atom at great speeds in concentric shells. They believe that most of the internal volume of the atom is empty space. The word orbit comes from the Bohr model of the atom (early 1900's) and is still used even though we know electrons do not orbit the nuclei. (note: things get really confusing here. Molecular bonding models have electrons orbiting two atoms in a figure 8, yet modern orbital theory has electrons jumping from point to point.) They cannot track any orbiting but know the probability of where the electron will be 90% of the time. When convenient they will say the electron jumps from point to point.
Clear Energy model: electrons do not orbit. As waves of clear energy converge on the nuclei the massless energy reaches a saturation point and a plasm field forms. This is energy transitioning from a clear state to a physical state. Out of this highly charged field electrons emerge from and dissolve back into the field millions of times per second; a massive local lightening storm. The nuclei will harvest energy from this field as needed and electrons will be absorbed. Electrons are transition particles.
Proton - Neutron
They tell us that protons and neutrons are different particles, they are incorrect.
In the corrected model protons and neutrons are the same particle, their only difference is the energy state each is in when observed. The atom's nucleus has an electric current running through it powering and binding the nucleons together. This current is fed by electrons harvested from the electron field. The nucleon's charge changes with the waves in the current cycling from a neutral to positive charge and back thousands of times a second.
Fact: If you leave a neutron alone it will become a proton. If you add energy to a proton it will become a neutron. They are the same size and we estimate the neutron to be 1 electron mass heavier than the proton. How can they not be the same particle?
This seems so obvious, unfortunately the original observation was made in the 1930's and accepted. (It is hard to kill old theories!) The observers had no other option to explain this besides declaring them distinctly separate particles. To have the nucleons changing states you would need a current which would mean you would need an energy source. Unfortunately the consensus model depended on Fundamental Forces and there was no energy source available in the model.
One of thousands of compounded errors, all caused by Einstein's omission.
Strong Force
What holds the nucleus of an atom together?
Observation: the nucleus of the atom has roughly equal numbers of protons and neutrons at any point in time. Protons are positively charged and should repel each other, yet the nuclei is tightly bonded. How does this happen?
SMT: the strong force holds the nuclei together. The strong force is one of several “Fundamental Forces” and is by far the most powerful. The strong force came from the Big Bang and is working in every atom in the universe.
CET: protons and neutrons are the same object in different states of charge. There is an inner nuclei current that bonds all of the nucleons together much like an electric lock. Energy is harvested from the plasma field to power this current. At any point in time roughly half of the nucleons will appear as a proton and half will be neutral. A nanosecond later they reverse states.
Nuclear Fusion
In the consensus model they believe that nuclear fusion is a massively exothermic reaction. If you force four hydrogen atoms together under great temperatures and pressures there will be an enormous release of energy. This theory gathered popularity in the 1920's and 30's as the only plausible theory to explain the sun's luminosity. Because of Einstein's omission this was the only theoretical option they had and still is the only option today under the limitations of current theory.
We have spent the last 50 years following this theory looking for a way to harvest energy from nuclear fusion with little or no success. This again is flawed theory leading researchers down a dead end road.
Clear Energy Theory:
Nuclear fusion is simply energy transitioning from a kinetic state to a nuclear state. Deep inside of large objects (including the earth) the temperatures and pressures are so great that atoms will be forced through other atom's plasma fields and the nucleons will reconfigure into a more complex element. The result is a reduction in pressure in that region, the combined atom will occupy less volume than the two separate atoms. The energy will now be in the combined atom. Break the nuclei apart and the energy will convert back from a nuclear state to a kinetic state; Boom. Nuclear fusion is a net zero energy transaction, simply a shift from one state to another. It is not the Holy Grail for unlimited clean energy, harvesting Clear Energy is. We should learn from our mitochondria.
PROFILE
"The idea came like a flash of lightning and in an instant the truth was revealed."
Over a 30-year period, I experienced scores of extraordinary REM sleep epiphanies. All of them built up to October 8th, 2008, when at 2 am I woke up with a bolt of absolute clarity and had a unified theory of physics that included an on-ramp for the sciences of consciousness and, more importantly for me, an on-ramp for metaphysics.
This journey began in the fall of 1974 when my parents told me that my mom had been diagnosed with ovarian cancer, a terminal diagnosis. I was 17 and headed back to prep school for my senior year.
The only options for trying to become comfortable with this topic were provided by religious groups, Christianity being the most obvious option for me. The idea that God was so benevolent and all-caring did not reconcile with the horror of watching my mother get eaten alive from the inside out. The religious theory did not reconcile with the violence and suffering that I saw on TV every day: war, assassinations, starvation, and seemingly endless suffering. Good people were being punished and many bad people were doing just fine. If God was so all-caring and we were his children, why would he let this happen? Well, to understand God you have to swallow the faith pill first, something I just could not do.
Looking for a theory to support a continuation of life begins with a binary question. Is there more to life than what we have here? If your answer is no, then don’t worry about it. I choose yes for two reasons. First, I am an optimist by nature. Second, if I am wrong, I will never know it, so why not try?
After Mom died, I started casually looking to science for possible answers. If life does have a purpose and there is a continuation, then there must be some connection between our existence here and what comes after. I found that there was absolutely no room within the standard model of physics for any connection to metaphysics. There wasn’t even an effort within the mainstream to try and understand consciousness. This was a very disappointing revelation.
Over the years, I read scientific magazines and talked with very smart physicist friends about the current state of our sciences. Everyone was very happy with our physical science driving technological advancement, yet nobody was happy with our theoretical sciences attempting to explain the very small and impossible to see (quantum) or the very large and far away (relativity).
The more I looked into the foundations of relativity and quantum theory, the more dysfunctional it became. It is confused, it conflicts with itself, much of it is completely illogical and absolutely all of it is dependent on our foundational theories established in 1930 being correct. Amazingly, our scientific theories were less believable than our religious theories.
Then the epiphanies began to happen. They were all the same, I would come out of REM sleep and bolt awake with answers to questions that floated deep in my subconscious. Things I should not have known came to me out of the blue. I would have to get out of bed and either leave myself a voicemail or write the thoughts into a journal to go back to sleep. I never told anyone about what was happening to me, not even my wife. (I understand now that these experiences are not unique, and that there are well-documented extraordinary downloads that many people have experienced.)
Many times the epiphanies were incomplete but would lead to future, more complete epiphanies. There was no rhythm to the events. Sometimes they would happen a couple of times a month, and sometimes they would be years apart, but they kept coming. I made no effort to encourage the process, it was what it was. October 8th, 2008, I woke up with a simple correction to Einstein's gravitational theory that provided a platform to integrate sub-atomic theory with astrophysics, a potential unified theory of physics. More importantly, it provided a medium to begin integrating the study of consciousness into a corrected standard model. And it provided me a means to try and theorize a continuation of life, for my own benefit.
I didn’t discuss the unified theory with anyone for fear that it would be invalidated and I would go back to square one. I liked what I had and it brought me comfort. I did start to ask friends far more specific questions about the conflicts in the consensus model trying to learn if I had missed anything. So far so good. Four years later I was seated next to a friend who I consider one of the most spiritual people I have ever met, Nikki Johnson. She got me talking about my thoughts on metaphysics, and was surprisingly captivated. She made me promise to write this down and communicate it.
After several months of inactivity, she called and said she wanted me to meet her friend Cynthia Husted, a Ph.D. physicist, to discuss my corrected theory. Cynthia had recently recovered from a near-death experience after being bitten several times by a black widow spider stuck in her sweater. When she was brought back to life she was a different person. She had seen beyond anything she had ever dreamed. She had become a bit disillusioned by establishment physics and was open to the idea of the possibility that Einstein might have made a mistake.
I had a lot going on with my family and career and not wanting my theory to be invalidated, I avoided the get together. We finally met in 2013 at Nikki’s spiritual sanctuary next to her home in Northern California and began what would become a 4-year deep dive research project into the foundations of the theories that made up the consensus model. Without Cynthia’s help and knowledge, I would not be presenting this today. We gained access to Stanford University’s online libraries and she did a deep dive in areas where the two theories had the greatest conflicts. She tracked down what the actual observations were that led to different theories, separating facts from theory and making sure that the corrected model did not conflict with any scientific facts. Indeed, the corrected theory is consistent with all actual scientific observations.
It took Cynthia two years to get over her indoctrination bias and she discovered that not only was the corrected theory unified but it eliminated the need for dozens of band-aid theories added over the last 100 years to prop up the obviously failing model. Things as illogical and old as the dependence on Fundamental Forces, and as new as Dark Matter and its ugly twin Dark Energy could go. This work could not have been done 20 years ago. The internet and search engines allowed us to focus on key issues without getting bogged down in the minutiae.
All that I ask of anyone interested in continuing this discussion is that you come to understand that Einstein very well could have made a first principles error, and 100 years of theoretical research may have been sent off in the wrong direction. You will find that the corrected theory is consistent with all scientific observations before they were evaluated through the lens of our current model. The only way out of this self-created mess is to go back, correct the first principles error and view all scientific observations through a correct theoretical lens and see what we have. The result may lead us to a much-needed paradigm shift.